Yesterday, I was trying to decide whether we should cancel the India/Nepal leg of our trip and instead see Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Singapore (collectively known as the Malay Archipelago). After doing some research on Indonesia and Malaysia (I already know a bit about the Philippines and Singapore), I decided that the better idea would be to stick with the India/Nepal plan, for two main reasons: I've heard much more good things about India and Nepal than the Malay Archipelago, and, well, India/Nepal was my original plan, and I tend to stick with my plans - even tentative ones - unless I have good reason to change them. Since the vacation value of India and Nepal vs the Malay Archipelago seems to be a wash, I am sticking with India and Nepal.
So, I have narrowed the countries we will visit down to India/Nepal and Thailand/Cambodia/Laos/Vietnam (which will be referred to as the SE Asian Mainland from here on), and since India is such a vast country, it seems logical to allocate two months to India/Nepal and two months to the SE Asian Mainland.
The trip is scheduled to begin on the first of March, and assuming we are able to get our Indian visas in Bangkok in a week, we should be in India by March the 10th, which is a week before Holi. If we spend 5 weeks in India, we will arrive in Nepal towards the end of April, which is a great time for hiking the Himalayas, as temperatures are relatively warm and everything is in full bloom. That will give us three weeks in Nepal, which is just enough time to complete either the Mt Everest Base Camp hike or the Annapurna Circuit hike. More on that below.
Edit: It looks like Holi begins on March 1 this year, so we may be starting the trip a week early. It will cost me $1.5k to lose that week of work, but Holi seems like something that is not to be missed.
That said, here is a preliminary list of places I'd like to go in India:
- Darjeeling
- Kolkata
- Varanasi
- Goa
- Mumbai
- The Golden Temple at Amritsar (Next to Chandigarh, but closer to the Pakistani border)
- Delhi
- The Taj Majal at Agra
- Jammu and Kashmir, specifically Ladakh, which is the much safer eastern portion of the state. However, this is contingent on both stable Indian/Pakistani/Chinese politics as well as advice given to us from other travelers in India.
- Teh Mahabodhi Temple at Bodh Gaya, which is where Buddha attained enlightenment (between Kolkata and Varanasi).
This is a dynamic list - it can (and almost certainly will) change, depending on a variety of factors. It is likely that once we are actually in India, we will receive many recommendations from more experienced travelers and will modify our plans accordingly, but I think it is a good idea to have at least a vague notion of what one wants to do when traveling in strange lands before one arrives there. It is easier to build a framework when time is plentiful, and to modify it as necessary when time is short, than it is to start with nothing and plan the trip from scratch upon arrival. Others may disagree, and if I did not have 12 hours of time to surf the internet every day, I would probably not do nearly as much research as I am doing, but I need a way to pass the time, and reddit has gotten old.
Anyways, what I'm trying to do is determine the best point of entry and basic route to see these things. Should we start at Varanasi or Darjeeling for Holi, stay a few days in Kolkata, head to Goa, head back up the northwest cost to Mumbai, northeast to the Golden Temple at Amritsar (possibly further into Ladakh) before crossing the border into Nepal?
Edit: Alternatively, we could just fly into Goa, which is somewhat of a mecca for backpackers in India, and decide where we want to go from there based on what we find from talking to people. Holi isn't such a big deal in Goa, so we'd miss out on that, but we could circle back and see Varanasi and/or Darjeeling before heading into Nepal if we want to.
Also, there's the possibility that we see mainland SE Asia first, and do India/Nepal second. Either way, we're going to be hot in June and July.
